Repost: YOU CAN TELL THE LEADERS BY THE ARROWS IN THEIR BACKS

I wish I would’ve thought of this title. Wow. From http://prairiemary.blogspot.com/

The latest group to be caught up in and split apart by the monetizing of suffering and injustice has been American Indians, all stirred up about the Eloise Cobell case that will (soon, we hope) bring them some money. The lawsuit has been an attempt at compensation and closure to the admitted government raid on reservation assets, the profits of which were supposed to have been held in trust for tribal members. Instead they were thrown into the general revenues without earmarks and with such lousy bookkeeping (in some cases literally “ratty” records in substandard warehouses) that no one really knew who was owed what. The Cobell lawsuit had two goals. One was to compensate for the losses already due to mismanagement and the other was to reform the future handling of all funds in trust. The computer software alone was so hack-able that the judge closed down the Department of the Interior system until it could be fixed.

This is NOT a general award to all Indians everywhere but only those who benefit from trust status. Money that will be sent to the plaintiffs at this time is the estimated loss of money by PEOPLE WHO HAD LAND IN TRUST STATUS. Not every Indian has lands in trust status. Those who do don’t have access to their ownership but must “trust” the government to manage them for the most profit and send the owners the proceeds. In the Sixties there was a movement to return private-Indian-owned land to trust status in order to avoid county and state tax jurisdiction. Whether they are subject to county and state law enforcement has never been questioned from that angle. I suspect that the ultimate outcome of the Cobell lawsuit will simply be the elimination of government trust for Indian-owned land, an outcome some have wanted for a long time. One of the abiding controversies among tribal peoples has always been between those who want to manage their own affairs and those who would rather the government managed things.

Trust lands are not the same thing as reservation lands. There are residential lots in Valier (which is off the reservation), which are in trust with the federal government for the benefit of the legal Indian owners rather than being privately owned and managed. Land is taken OUT of trust status through action by the owner, maybe by petitioning for reclassification from “incompetent” (like being too young, not speaking English, or not understanding fancy legal categories and rules) to competence. This is called “patenting.” Some people patented their land simply because they did NOT consider themselves incompetent and thought the legal term had something personal to do with their intelligence.

After the Dawes Act, which divvied the tribal land up Homestead style, assigning allotments to individuals, the land was always first put into trust. Then some people patented their land. The accusation is that some people who truly WERE incompetent for some reason were “helped” to patent their land, which meant that it could be sold by them — maybe not at a fair price nor for a good reason — or attached to pay bills owed to local merchants, which the owners had not expected to happen. Whatever it was that happened, that’s an entirely different matter that has not been consolidated into a class action, at least not as far as I know. There are diligent and dedicated people accumulating facts and it may be that in the future there will be such a lawsuit.

Another kind of claim that distracts and confuses people is compensation for lands seized or overrun in contradiction of treaty assurances; for example, both the Black Hills and the Sweetgrass Hills, both of which were assigned to the Indians and then grabbed back by non-Indians because of the discovery of gold. These violations were eventually compensated by a government pay-out of a major block of money. On the Native American side a big part of the argument was that these high refugia hills were spiritually valorized places of enormous significance to the autochthonous peoples in the same way as European cathedrals. (A lot of white people also feel they are sacred.) The payout did not come to individuals, but to tribes as a whole.

A third kind of payout is the dividends earned by the tribal corporation. The tribal council operates on the model of a corporation in which each member is entitled to a share. The council is the same as the board of a corporation. Thus, at the end of the year, the dividends might be distributed as per capita checks.

A strong reason for monetizing society the way we do today is that it keeps order, but some people have figured out that it is a system that can be used as emotional extortion, among other things. It is in the extortionists’ interest to remain angrily “afflicted.” Since the situation of NA’s is already so confused in most minds, this tendency is easily exploited, if for nothing more than political and emotional self-righteousness.

Gyasi Ross, a lawyer and blogger associated with “Indian Country Today,” recently tried to make some points about these matters. On “Thing About Skins and Other Curios” he brought into the equation his grandfather, Percy Bullchild, who wrote “The Sun Comes Down,” an authentic Blackfeet-written book legitimately published. Right way there was a firestorm of criticism: that Percy was selfish, that he had it wrong, that he should not have told what he did, that he was a “sell-out,” “opportunist,” “traitor.” Almost exactly the same accusations as of Eloise. If you’ve lived on a rez, you’ll know this is predictable. Under it is the same demand: “Where’s MY cut?”

Said Gyasi, “. . . frankly, it seemed somewhat cowardly for someone to criticize a person for doing a good thing that they were unwilling to do themselves. . .”

“In my estimation, this Native woman [Eloise] is a hero, a warrior.”

As soon as Gyasi posted this, he got another wave of flame, all of it anonymous, as well as some approval from people with real names, including me. As soon as my name appeared, the attacks turned from Eloise to me. That was predictable. I’m white. And I couldn’t help but note that the anonymous people were evidently hiding behind the door in English class. I don’t know how they managed to learn to keyboard.

So Eloise is a two-fold heroine, first for facing down the government and second for having to withstand illiterate attacks from her own people. The latter force is what makes so many people reluctant to stand up for what is right. Also, it reinforces the prejudices of people who have a bad opinion of Indians. And it makes heroes wonder what they were thinking.

I just don’t get why the critics comment anonymously. If they think they will get money out of their high dudgeon, how will anyone know where to send the check? Any anonymous person who sends an anonymous comment to this blog on this post will be deleted. I just hate to see them embarrass themselves.

Advertisements
Published in: on April 16, 2010 at 5:41 pm  Comments (2)  

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://thingaboutskins.wordpress.com/2010/04/16/repost-you-can-tell-the-leaders-by-the-arrows-in-their-backs/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

2 CommentsLeave a comment

  1. “I learned a long time ago that I can’t control the challenges the Creator sends my way, but I can control the way I think about them and deal with them.” -Wilma Mankiller

    http://www.cherokee.org/NewsRoom/FullStory/3160/Page/Default.aspx

    Rather than remain complacent in a place where we just feel sorry for ourselves (feel persecuted and use that as an excuse to give up), we must realize certain truths about humanity. This is not just an Indian problem. Other oppressed groups went through the same chaotic times in dealing with the trauma from wars, attacks for not assimilating, and oppression. Rather than call each other names, we must get over ourselves and move forward toward a common goal.

    Unfortunately, Cobell has not convinced us that her goal is one that we can all agree to follow her in pursuing.

    I don’t agree with the settlement. I’ve kept up on the news about it, read the settlement and have talked with as many people as I can to get various view points on the settlement. I really wish she would be stronger than what she is right now and keep fighting for a more just situation. There are precedents in the settlement that will lead to situations among my tribe where more land is possible to be lost. I cannot support the settlement because of this. I could care less about the money. I have never seen it so far and figured out a way to survive without it, I can keep surviving without it. To tell us that the offer is as good as it gets after just 13 years does not mean a whole lot to me. Jews and Roma (Gypsies) have refused to assimilate for thousands of years and were landless poor and suffered horrendous crimes against humanity. However, Jews have stayed strong and eventually got their land back. Land and a strong mindset are most important in sustaining the survival of a people.

    Cobell is not a personal Jesus. She can fight harder, and if she is not willing to do so, then there will be others who will.

  2. Many Indians have deep respect and appreciation for Eloise Cobell’s work but now the matter is in the hands of the US Congress and the entirety of Indian Country to decide. If Indian Country agrees with the settlement that Ms. Cobell and her attorneys negotiated then we may see enacting legislation. We’re being asked to weigh the pros and cons of the settlement. That’s what we’re doing, not shooting arrows into the backs of our leaders, no, we’re asserting our right to be fully consulted with about a settlement that will exhaust our future legal options, so we have to ask ourselves if we believe the settlement is enough. We also need a real chance to discuss this. Many Indians are hoping to amend the current settlement in favor of a better one, if we cannot get to that place then we’re willing to forgo any settlement at all, especially if the settlement makes very little difference in the quality of our lives. I wish our legal system would provide immediate compensation to the attorneys who put money into this but I don’t want to repeat the mistakes of the Indian Claims Commission where the attorneys involved were willing to take monetary settlements just because they wanted to be paid. Meanwhile Indian nations’ claims were exhausted across the country and no palpable difference was made for the American Indian Nations’ quality of life.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: